The Bible Miniseries Criticisms


 

I must admit that I really enjoyed part one of  The Bible miniseries.  However, I have heard some less than favorable comments from individuals with a background in the Bible.

Before I begin with any of the accounts to retell biblical passages, you must know that producers use what is called, “Creative license” when creating any film.

This is used to promote dramatization and to engage the viewers into the scenes.

Why is this important to understand?   Because the average person says that reading the Bible is boring and irrelevant to today’s culture.

Retelling biblical stories in an animated and creative way may spark interest and motivate the nominal Christian, as well as, the UN-Churched to pick up the Bible and read It for themselves.

Here are some top criticisms/observations I heard:

  • The Angels that approached Abraham and Sarah were NOT Black, Asian or White.
  • The Angels that went to Sodom and Gomorrah were not beaten and did not BEG Lot for help; nor were they ninjas.
  • Isaac was not a boy (age 10) when Abraham offered him up as a sacrifice.
  • Incomplete and they skipped the life of the major patriarchs: Isaac, Jacob, and Joseph.
  • They didn’t show Moses’ staff  turning into a snake.
  • Hebrew people crossed the Red Sea on DRY GROUND not a wet ground with water spraying on them.

Multi-Cultural Angels

I thought the use of a multicultural team was most creative.  Our God is a God to all people.  If we were to really trace the ethnic background of all the characters of the Bible, there are those who would have said that the entire cast should have been Black – as in dark skinned people.

Angels took a lickin, but kept on tickin

I enjoy suspense movies especially fighting scenes where the good guy is fighting the bad guy.  Characters like Bruce Willis, Steven Segal. Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham are some of my favorites not because they can fight, but that they can also take a beat down.

I’m gonna take a stab at why I think they wrote it this way.  The angels stated that they were going to spend the night in the square.  Lot was desperate to protect them from the evils of the street. The creative license was to show just how evil and perverse the people of Sodom were.

Come on, No Ninjas!

ninjaWhen I saw the Angels break out in a fighting scene I was reminded of Michael, the arch angel and his military team engaged in battle with the devil and his imps when trying to answer Daniel’s prayer.

I am comforted by this passage of scripture because Hollywood has depicted angels as soft, cute, harmless and even powerLESS beings.

The Bible is clear in depicting the different roles angels play, especially those protective fighting angels.  I’m glad they were not portrayed as wimps and weaklings, but powerful beings that do what needs to be done to protect us everyday!

The ninja or Jackie Chan affects made for better entertainment for the viewer.  I can only guess that God’s military warrior angels could master those swords just as well.

Just how old was Isaac?

It wasn’t until about 15 years ago that I found out that Isaac may not have been a child when his dad offered him up as a sacrifice.  Scholars debate this fact and have Isaac’s age anywhere from 5 to 36.

Some facts that brought about this dispute include: the age of both Abraham and Sarah, Ishmael, the cultural age of weaning children, the age of Sarah’s death, along with some other historical events.

Most classic biblical movies have  Isaac depicted as a young boy. The point here was to demonstrate Abraham’s faith in God as well as God’s promise to provide.

Why did they skip events?

Yes it did appear as if the producers did skip some crucial scenes such as the life of Isaac, Jacob and Joseph, even Aaron’s staff turning into a snake.

Two points, there are still four more shows  and perhaps we may be given a glance back and secondly the goal of the producers is to highlight the entire Bible in 10 hours. Certainly, they will use their creative license in determining what things to air and what things to skip.

Red Sea wet or dry?

The Bible does tell us that they walked across on dry ground and the water stood up like a wall on both sides. I can see why some would have trouble with this as it seems to minimize God’s intervention.  Clearly the producers used a creative privilege here too.  Perhaps it would have cost them too much time to truly unpack this scene.

 

The important thing is that The Bible is being brought into many homes around the world. It gets us all talking and gives us the opportunity to fill in the gaps in order to complete the story. We can only pray that this experience will result in people being interested in learning more and reading the Bible for themselves.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Please note: I reserve the right to delete comments that are offensive or off-topic.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 thoughts on “The Bible Miniseries Criticisms

  1. I enjoyed part one. I knew it would have some discrepancies, that’s TV.
    Some un-churched could get something from it that might would bring the to God.

    • I pray so. Whenever people put things like this together it generally is for more than just entertainment. We plant the seed… God will do the drawing. Thanks for your feedback!

  2. To God be the GLORY.
    The earth is the Lords and the fulness there of. Jesus used parables. Nothing wrong with using animation TO LIFT UP JESUS.

    To GOD BE THE GLORY.

    Very Good Job-

    • Thank you! Hope you get to see the show if you haven’t already. Sundays at 8PM on History channel. Direct TV channel 269, Verizon FIOS channel 128, Comcast Infinity channel 38, HD 237. Also on Monday evenings on Lifetime!

  3. Thanksss
    You put a lot of work / energy in making sure your readers are informed.
    Usually, this kind of service is unheard of without a $$$$ attached to it.
    This is what they call PAYING FORWARD.

    Be not weary in WELL DOING- you will reap if you faint not.

  4. The series clearly presented Jesus as the great ‘world changer’, specifically in Jesus’ words to Peter. Later Ananias told Paul the he was chosen by God to ‘change the world’. Both are in error. Jesus came to die for our sins, not to change the world. He did, of course, but it was NOT his mission. Paul went through Asia Minor preaching the Gospel that Christ died for our sins and NEVER said anything about ‘changing the world’. The miniseries had Peter actually saying “Jesus didn’t die’ and Stephen saying ‘They tried to kill Jesus, but failed’. If word are words, those are both lies. The miniseries will undoubtedly make a boat load of money, but it was an adventure in missing the point of the Gospel.